Stage by Stage : an event at the JaipurLiterature Festival (JLF) raised many question concerning the modern Indian theater. Among them, the one which particularly touched my conscience was: “why did the theater movement died in India post 1980s?”
Girish Karnad was one
of the speakers for this particular event and according to him the spread and
reach of television and spatial disadvantage (location of theaters) were the main causes among many
for the fall of theatre in India. I agree with his remark to the procedural failure
of theater movement but at the same time I find myself confronting with the
question of its continued absence in India. Can I find solace in putting all
the blame on the apathy of Indian audience?
Sometime during the show Grisih Karnad agreed that Indian society
failed to produce good play writers. Now if we juxtapose this absence of good
play writers with the spatial disadvantage then we find that the contemporary Indian
theatre is either mere improvisation of earlier Indian plays or repetition of western
plays. Therefore it is not the apathy of Indian audience but a systemic failure
to cultivate and nurture our heritage.
Protected heritage in India is largely
static and monolithic; therefore cultural practises such as,
those practiced by tribal and rural people is left to be scavenged by either the
cultural tourism or directionless development. The future of Indian theater depends on the survival of Indian culture (not the pseudo Indian Culture) because good plays always draw clues form cultural uniqueness.

